Since 2002 the European Union (EU) and countries
of the Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific Group (ACP) have been
negotiating Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) as part of the
Cotonou Agreement. EPAs aim to establish "new WTO compatible trading
arrangements removing progressively barriers of trade between EU
and ACP countries" which would build on "the regional integration
initiatives of ACP states" and promote "sustainable development
and contribute to poverty eradication in the ACP countries ".
EPAs as they are currently being set up and negotiated are essentially
Free Trade Agreements.
Consistently, the EU has insisted that EPAs be based on a tight
interpretation of WTO rules aiming for the elimination of all trade
barriers on more than 90% of EU-ACP trade, within the shortest possible
transitional time period. In addition the EU is demanding negotiations
in the field of investment, competition, trade facilitation, government
procurement, data protection and services. These negotiations were
rejected by ACP countries in the WTO because of their negative implications
for development. Under the guise of a 'development partnership'
the EU is re-introducing its WTO free trade agenda through EPAs.
Despite a great deal of reluctance from ACP countries, the European
Commission has put heavy economic and political pressure to rush
into the EPA free trade negotiations without sufficient preparation.
Those voices in Europe and the ACP urging the Commission to look
for other options were ignored. As a result of heavy dependence
on aid, ACP governments have little choice but to give in to the
EU's demand that they open up their markets to European goods and
services. The overwhelming emphasis on liberalisation in the EPA
negotiations proves that these negotiations are about expanding
Europe's access to ACP markets, rather than about ACP countries'
development.
Regional integration efforts are central to ACP countries' development
strategies. EPAs will endanger the fragile processes of regional
integration and expose ACP producers to unfair European competition
in domestic and regional markets. The result will be deeper unemployment,
loss of livelihoods, food insecurity and social inequality. ACP
governments will face significant losses in public revenue from
the elimination of import duties and will continue to suffer the
problem of capital flight associated with liberalisation. While
the European Commission argues that EPAs are 'instruments for development'
all assessments so far indicate that the burden of adjustment for
EPAs will be carried exclusively by the ACP countries, including
those that are LDCs.
The EU has narrowed down the Cotonou objectives of poverty eradication
and sustainable development to a self-serving trade and investment
liberalisation agenda. EPAs will increase the domination and concentration
of European firms, goods and services. As such, EPAs will deepen
- and prolong - the socio-economic decline and political fragility
that characterises most ACP countries. EPAs based on reciprocal
trade agreements do not make sense economically, or developmentally
for ACP countries.
Therefore, we reject these "Economic Partnership Agreements" as
currently envisaged.
We call for an overhaul and review of the EU's neo-liberal external
trade policy, particularly with respect to developing countries.
We demand that EU-ACP trade cooperation should be founded on an
approach that is:
- based on a principle of non-reciprocity, as instituted in
GSPs and special and differential treatment in the WTO
- protects ACP producers domestic and regional markets.
- reverses the pressure for trade and investment liberalisation
- allows the necessary policy space and supports ACP countries
to pursue their own development strategies.
Go to Sign-on